Friday, August 5, 2011

How to Handle Scope Creep??

Project Description:
This project was implement to effectively implement an learning management system that would facilitate GMP training, which is mandated by the FDA, to provide accurate electronic training records for auditing purposes, to increase management’s  visibility of the Training system compliance state and to strengthen the sites compliance position by reducing the number of deviations.   
The objective of the project was:
·         to reduce the human error related deviations related to lack of training.
·         to improve the site’s compliance state by providing evidence of knowledge transfer and training effectiveness
·         and,  to ensure all job position have adequate training requirements in their curricula

Two phases of the project were established, but phase I was planned to address a critical state of the manufacturing area for the products.  The plan and project milestones included:
1.      Provide training to managers on how to perform Curriculum Development analysis for department and position specific training requirements (PSTR).
a.      49 Employees
2.      Perform an assessment of job descriptions compared to current position specific training requirements forms by position to confirm that employees are assigned appropriate position specific training. 
3.      Develop electronic training modules for SOPs to be uploaded and maintained in Noven University for 184 courses.
4.      Develop Curriculum with assigned position specific training in the learning management system for 28 positions affecting 70 employees.
5.      Convert training records from paper to electronic records to be maintained in an electronic repository for auditing purposes.
6.      Eliminate the use of training records forms for audits to reduce the possibility of misplaced training records; and, to reduce the time invested in the  maintenance of training records in different repositories used during audits to verify training.
a.      Current Training Forms Being Used: 
·   New Employee Introductory Training Form
·   Group Training Form
·   Individual Training Form
·   Required Training/Re-training Form
7.      Testing and Implementation of courses, curriculum and learning management system
8.      Monitor Compliance

The timeline was very aggressive since the FDA had committed to a reinspection in 90 days.  The project was time lined for a 45 days completion and implementation to allow for system and user trouble shooting. 
Scope Creep:
During the assessment of position and job descriptions it was identified that there were only job descriptions for 60% of the positions, making it almost impossible to meet the September 15th deadline since job description would have to be created from scratch.  The stakeholders requested that new job descriptions be developed and used for the curriculum building process.  Several meetings were held with the stakeholders and the team to identify how to manage the timeline and the new deliverable/tasks.  Because this was an FDA requirement, there was no negotiating with the timeline. 
How  to managed the issue and control the project timeline:
As the project manager I prepare a request for staff (additional resources) that would become shared costs by each department who did not provide the required job descriptions for each position being addressed.  I prepared a resource allocation plan identifying 3 persons, 1 from each department affected, included the amount of time it would take to develop a job description and presented it as a change of scope to the stakeholders.  The stakeholders agreed that it was the responsibility of each manager to have a job description for each position in their department, and Human Resources role to verify this task is completed.  As a result, the stakeholders divided the expense of the 3 additional resources needed between each department, QA, QC and Manufacturing, as well as Human Resources since it was identified as a hole in their system.  A Change of Scope was signed by the Project manager and Stakeholders. 
Additional Advice:
It happens in every project, you begin with a specific goal or objective and as you rollout the project something else needs to be done, or it’s a great opportunity to do an additional task.  One of the biggest challenges that I have experienced is balancing the timeline or budget.  Research indicates that 65% of project do not successfully meeting the timeline or budget. (Portny).
A successful project manager will always determine the scope, consistently review the project plan and communicate to the team and stakeholder(s); formally address any changes immediately and in writing; do not sway from the approved timeline; and finally be realistic when developing the timeline and budget, and be flexible.

5 comments:

  1. This is a test comment to ensure that viewers can post.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Elia

    Vince Budrovich (n.d.) states that with every project we have trade-offs, which are things we do not want to do but we have to do. The five variables of projects that involve trade-offs are: time, money, people, quality, and scope. As project managers, we make trade-offs based on the priorities of the organization. There is no one-size-fits-all method for determining trade-offs. For your project, you could not increase time, as the project was required by the FDA to be completed by a specified date. You also could not decrease quality or scope. This means that you increased the other two variables: time and money.

    As project managers, we need to recognize that scope creep is inevitable. To help monitor and control scope creep, project managers should prepare a change control system, require change orders that include descriptions of resulting plan changes for every requested change, have the change order signed by the client and senior management, and reflect the change in the project plan and schedule once the change has been approved (Portny, Mantel, Meredith, Shafer, Sutton, & Kramer, p. 347).

    Sue

    Budrovich, V. (n.d.). Practioner voices: Resource challenges. Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). Video.

    Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. E. (2008). Project management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Elia,

    Your approach to managing through scope creep was well thought out. It seems like one of the reasons why is because you quickly defined who was accountable for the job descriptions and moved to ensure their me their responsibilities. Having clear accountability minimizes wasted time and mistakes (Portny, Mantel, Meredith, Shafer, Sutton, Kramer, 2008). This can help your project move ahead smoothly even during scope creep. It seems that your experience proves this out.

    Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. E. (2008). Project management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp 377-399

    ReplyDelete
  4. Greetings Lora:

    The project description and scope creep are mind blogging. I was perplexed by the absence of a job description for 40% of the positions. How is this possible? How could a Human Resource hire a person, give him/her a title, but not have a description of their duties. Your description brings up two issues. The first issue is the plan. Since one of the focal points was the job description of employees, why this information not examined/assessed during the planning stages? My second issue centers around scope creep and the damage it can potentially cause to people and their career. Scope creep is defined as a natural tendency of the client or project team member to try to improve the project is output as the project progresses (Portny, S., et al, pp346). The situation you described appears more as a negligence of duty on the part of personnel. Consistent with the procedures outline in our course texts, you have communicated the change and obtained written approvals. Good luck!

    Resources:
    Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. E. (2008). Project Management: Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling Projects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Elia hello,

    Your experience is very educational and informative. Your analysis and adivce is right on. As mention in the video of "Monitoring Projects" with Dr. Stolovtich, the project manager MUST be focused on the big 3: timeline, budget, and clients.

    In my experience personally or profession and especially with the course project the timeline and budget seem to be essential, but at the same time the hardest to manage. In addition to the timeline and budgeting, " monitoring schedule performance, work-effort, and expenditures and make control decisions accordingly. Scope creep is inevitable with projects, but a change control susem can lesson its sressful aspectics" (Portny, S., et al, p348).

    Resources:
    Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. E. (2008). Project Management: Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling Projects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    Video program: "Monitoring Projects" with Dr. Harold Stolovitch

    ReplyDelete